This article conducts a practical performance test of GPT-5.2-Codex. Through a Minecraft clone prompt experiment, it was found that compared to GPT-5.2, there is a significant improvement in processing speed—at least 50% faster, with completion time reduced from about 10 minutes to 4 minutes. However, in terms of final product quality, both achieved similar completion levels with no obvious capability improvements. For comparison, Opus 4.5 was closer to the original textures in visual fidelity but had more bugs, such as interface interaction issues. The test results suggest that current AI model iterations may focus more on efficiency optimization rather than capability leaps, which holds important reference value for AI application development. The author emphasizes that the test is based on subjective evaluation and is for reference only.
GPT-5.2-Codex Test: 50% Speed Boost, No Significant Capability Changes
相关推荐
Codex 背后的 Harness:OpenAI 把 Coding Agent 的控制层讲透了
Codex 离线安装包获取与内网部署: npm 缓存、依赖打包与版本校验
Codex 磁盘占用异常: 失控写盘的根因与排查清理
Codex vs Cursor 额度对比: 价格、限制与选型建议
Codex CLI MCP 服务器 logout 吞 session: 复现与修复
Codex macOS code_sign_clone 占几十 GB 磁盘: 真相与清理
Codex CLI Intel Mac 安装指南:版本、Node 与 Rosetta
大模型选型指南 2026:Claude/GPT/Gemini/Grok/DeepSeek 怎么选