This article tackles the challenge of selecting AI coding tools for Chinese companies, comparing three options: Kiro, Trae, and Qoder. The author proposes a practical testing approach: having each tool create a simple Android app, then compiling and uploading it via GitHub Action workflows to assess their viability as development assistants. Test results indicate Kiro is functional, Trae underperformed, while Qoder remains untested. This workflow-based testing methodology offers an objective evaluation framework for businesses choosing AI programming tools, enabling more informed decision-making.
Original Link:V2EX Share & Discover






AI周刊:大模型、智能体与产业动态追踪
程序员数学扫盲课
冲浪推荐:AI工具与技术精选导航
Claude Code 全体系指南:AI 编程智能体实战
最新评论
i2znfo
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good. https://www.binance.info/register?ref=IHJUI7TF
Everyone loves what you guys tend to be up too. This sort of clever work and coverage! Keep up the excellent works guys I've incorporated you guys to blogroll.
handwritten synonym
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks! https://www.binance.info/sl/register?ref=GQ1JXNRE
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me. https://accounts.binance.info/en/register-person?ref=JHQQKNKN
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good. https://accounts.binance.info/register-person?ref=IXBIAFVY