This article explores the issue of language choice when users interact with AI, focusing on the differences in interaction experience between Chinese and English. The author shares personal observations: OpenAI may have exhibited “diminished intelligence” for Chinese users in its early stages, and asks if Gemini has similar issues. Based on actual usage, English Q&A has shorter thinking time and higher efficiency, possibly due to the relatively lower quality of Chinese language corpus. In community discussions, multiple participants shared similar experiences, triggering reflections on language bias in AI models and the quality of training data. Although this is a forum post, it provides valuable industry insights, revealing the actual challenges of AI language processing, and has reference value for optimizing AI interaction experiences.
Original Link:Linux.do






AI周刊:大模型、智能体与产业动态追踪
程序员数学扫盲课
冲浪推荐:AI工具与技术精选导航
Claude Code 全体系指南:AI 编程智能体实战
最新评论
i2znfo
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good. https://www.binance.info/register?ref=IHJUI7TF
Everyone loves what you guys tend to be up too. This sort of clever work and coverage! Keep up the excellent works guys I've incorporated you guys to blogroll.
handwritten synonym
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks! https://www.binance.info/sl/register?ref=GQ1JXNRE
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me. https://accounts.binance.info/en/register-person?ref=JHQQKNKN
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good. https://accounts.binance.info/register-person?ref=IXBIAFVY