本文源自Hacker News的讨论,聚焦于MISTRA双胞胎研究中排除非同卵双胞胎数据的争议。文章批评了1990年Science论文中未披露关键控制组数据的行为,认为这可能导致科学方法不当。辩论中,支持者强调智商遗传性证据(如双胞胎和领养研究),批评者则指出数据问题影响结论。讨论涉及遗传学、认知科学,对AI等智能研究领域有启示意义,突显科学严谨性的重要性。
原文链接:Hacker News
本文源自Hacker News的讨论,聚焦于MISTRA双胞胎研究中排除非同卵双胞胎数据的争议。文章批评了1990年Science论文中未披露关键控制组数据的行为,认为这可能导致科学方法不当。辩论中,支持者强调智商遗传性证据(如双胞胎和领养研究),批评者则指出数据问题影响结论。讨论涉及遗传学、认知科学,对AI等智能研究领域有启示意义,突显科学严谨性的重要性。
原文链接:Hacker News
最新评论
i2znfo
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good. https://www.binance.info/register?ref=IHJUI7TF
Everyone loves what you guys tend to be up too. This sort of clever work and coverage! Keep up the excellent works guys I've incorporated you guys to blogroll.
handwritten synonym
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks! https://www.binance.info/sl/register?ref=GQ1JXNRE
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me. https://accounts.binance.info/en/register-person?ref=JHQQKNKN
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good. https://accounts.binance.info/register-person?ref=IXBIAFVY