Recently, on the Linux.do tech forum, users have shared negative experiences with Google’s Gemini AI model. Users reported that the model’s answers have become perfunctory. For instance, it made basic errors when modifying flclash routing rules. Additionally, after uploading images in a conversation, the model would continuously explain the content of the first image, ignoring the most recently uploaded ones. Users suspect that the model might be secretly calling an older version or has been downgraded in the background, leading to a decline in performance. To resolve this issue, users tried creating new sessions and adding prompts to stabilize the model’s performance. This feedback reveals potential performance fluctuation problems in AI models during practical application, offering valuable insights and practical advice for users and developers who rely on AI tools, while also reminding them to pay attention to the stability of AI models.
Original Link:Linux.do






AI周刊:大模型、智能体与产业动态追踪
程序员数学扫盲课
冲浪推荐:AI工具与技术精选导航
Claude Code 全体系指南:AI 编程智能体实战
最新评论
i2znfo
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good. https://www.binance.info/register?ref=IHJUI7TF
Everyone loves what you guys tend to be up too. This sort of clever work and coverage! Keep up the excellent works guys I've incorporated you guys to blogroll.
handwritten synonym
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks! https://www.binance.info/sl/register?ref=GQ1JXNRE
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me. https://accounts.binance.info/en/register-person?ref=JHQQKNKN
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good. https://accounts.binance.info/register-person?ref=IXBIAFVY