The Stanford Agentic Reviewer tool, developed by Andrew Ng’s team, simulates reviewer thinking and provides substantive revision suggestions, generating significant attention in the research community. When the author tried using it, they were concerned about the risk of idea leakage and explored the potential privacy security issues that might arise with the popularization of AI review tools. The article further analyzes that as AI review methods increase, it might evolve from an auxiliary tool to a necessary part of the research process, or even become a mandatory threshold. This phenomenon is similar to “tools dictating processes” seen in other fields. The content offers technical depth and industry insights, focusing on the risks and trends of cutting-edge AI applications, making it worthy of attention from tech readers.
Original Link:Linux.do
























最新评论
I don't think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
这个AI状态研究很深入,数据量也很大,很有参考价值。
我偶尔阅读 这个旅游网站。激励人心查看路线。
文章内容很有深度,AI模型的发展趋势值得关注。
内容丰富,对未来趋势分析得挺到位的。
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
光纤技术真厉害,文章解析得挺透彻的。
文章内容很实用,想了解更多相关技巧。