In a popular discussion within the Linux community, users shared their hands-on experiences with two AI tools: kiro and Antigravity. According to feedback from multiple users, kiro is extremely simple to operate—users just need to toss tasks to the system without any additional intervention. Antigravity, on the other hand, faces challenges such as excessive output and complex context processing, requiring users to break down tasks step by step; otherwise, the system tends to freeze. This significant difference in user experience has sparked a community debate: Is this a fundamental difference in the design of the two tools, or is it caused by improper user methods? The topic has attracted 27 posts and 12 participants, reflecting the real challenges AI tools face in practical applications.
Original Link:Linux.do
最新评论
I don't think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
这个AI状态研究很深入，数据量也很大，很有参考价值。
我偶尔阅读 这个旅游网站。激励人心查看路线。
文章内容很有深度，AI模型的发展趋势值得关注。
内容丰富，对未来趋势分析得挺到位的。
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
光纤技术真厉害，文章解析得挺透彻的。
文章内容很实用，想了解更多相关技巧。