在开发Agent系统过程中，作者面临预算有限的问题，需要大量读写代码。文章深入比较了几款主流AI模型：Deepseek v3.2，上下文仅160K，但价格低廉；Gemini 3 Flash，上下文超长，价格便宜，但能力待验证；Grok Code Fast1，上下文256K，但作为旧模型性能存疑；GPT-5.1-Codex-mini，价格实惠，能力未知。作者分享了实际使用经验，强调上下文长度、价格和性能的关键权衡，为AI开发者提供了宝贵的参考依据，帮助在资源受限下优化系统设计。
原文链接：Linux.do
On a Budget? In-Depth Comparison of AI Models实惠AI付费站推荐：支持编程与聊天AI-Generated UI Design: High Costs of Domestic Software vs. Google Model ExperienceAI Studio User Report: Gemini 3 Pro Rate Limit Triggered After Single UseUnveiling Cursor's Code Review Agent System PromptsAI Paper Writing Tools Compared: Claude, Gemini, and OpenAI - Which is Best?Users Seek Help as Gemini's Performance DeclinesGemini 3 Pro User Feedback: Disappearance of Deep Research Feature Sparks Speculation
最新评论
I don't think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
这个AI状态研究很深入，数据量也很大，很有参考价值。
我偶尔阅读 这个旅游网站。激励人心查看路线。
文章内容很有深度，AI模型的发展趋势值得关注。
内容丰富，对未来趋势分析得挺到位的。
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
光纤技术真厉害，文章解析得挺透彻的。
文章内容很实用，想了解更多相关技巧。