Users report about 90% trust in AI (ChatGPT), considering it superior to business partners in cognitive abilities and strategic judgment, comparing it to figures like Zhuge Liang and a straightforward general. However, AI isn’t 100% reliable and can make mistakes due to outdated data or misunderstanding. Trusting AI differs from trusting a calculator; it’s more like trusting a friend, requiring acceptance of consequences. The article introduces Bayesianism as a decision-making tool, emphasizing that in major decisions, 0% or 100% trust is taboo, suggesting deeper understanding of Bayesian calculations to optimize decisions. It also points out that AI’s dangerous capability is generating seemingly well-founded but baseless content, especially for those with weak critical thinking. The key is comparing decisions across different dimensions—AI may be more reliable than humans, who might engage in deception.
Original Link:V2EX Share & Discover
最新评论
I don't think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
这个AI状态研究很深入,数据量也很大,很有参考价值。
我偶尔阅读 这个旅游网站。激励人心查看路线。
文章内容很有深度,AI模型的发展趋势值得关注。
内容丰富,对未来趋势分析得挺到位的。
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
光纤技术真厉害,文章解析得挺透彻的。
文章内容很实用,想了解更多相关技巧。