The article explores the military standard MIL-STD-882E, which categorizes software control into four levels: the most dangerous is software directly controlling situations that could immediately lead to hazards; less dangerous is software control with delays or reliance on immediate human response; even less dangerous is software that doesn’t directly control but allows time for verification of recommendations; and the safest is software used only for auxiliary purposes. The author points out that with the development of LLM and computer vision technologies, software is being integrated into processes in unprecedented ways, making risk management more critical. This standard provides a practical framework for evaluating the safety and reliability of AI systems, especially applicable to high-risk fields such as autonomous driving and industrial control, emphasizing the importance of understanding software control levels in the AI era to ensure system safety.
Original link:Hacker News
最新评论
I don't think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
这个AI状态研究很深入,数据量也很大,很有参考价值。
我偶尔阅读 这个旅游网站。激励人心查看路线。
文章内容很有深度,AI模型的发展趋势值得关注。
内容丰富,对未来趋势分析得挺到位的。
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
光纤技术真厉害,文章解析得挺透彻的。
文章内容很实用,想了解更多相关技巧。