On the Linux.do technical forum, a user reported a specific bug encountered while using the Codex AI model. The issue is described as follows: within the same session, when a user first uses the /review command to get review results and then attempts to have the model modify the content, the system returns an error. The error details are: ‘Invalid ‘input[2].id’: ‘review:rollout:user’. Expected an ID that contains letters, numbers, underscores, or dashes, but this value contained additional characters.’ This indicates that the ID ‘review:rollout:user’ contains illegal characters such as colons, violating the ID format specification. The user is asking how to resolve this issue. This bug involves the API implementation and ID validation logic of the Codex model, and for AI developers, researchers, and users of Codex, it is a technical issue worth paying attention to, as it may affect the reliability of the model in automated tasks.
Original Link:Linux.do
最新评论
I don't think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
这个AI状态研究很深入,数据量也很大,很有参考价值。
我偶尔阅读 这个旅游网站。激励人心查看路线。
文章内容很有深度,AI模型的发展趋势值得关注。
内容丰富,对未来趋势分析得挺到位的。
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
光纤技术真厉害,文章解析得挺透彻的。
文章内容很实用,想了解更多相关技巧。